Many are shocked to learn what paprika is actually made of and realize that, in retrospect, it’s actually… simply put. For starters, the clue is frequently on the container.

Short history on Paprika

It is customarily prepared from Capsicum annuum varieties in the Longum group, which also includes chili peppers, although the peppers used for paprika typically have milder flavors and thinner flesh. Paprika is a spice that is made from dried and crushed red peppers.

The word “paprika” also refers to peppers from the Grossum group and the plant and fruit from which the spice is made in several languages, but not English.

All types of capsicum are descended from wild forebears that were domesticated in Central Mexico in North America, where they have been grown for millennia.

When peppers were introduced to Spain in the 16th century, the peppers were subsequently introduced to the Old World. Many cuisines utilize the seasoning to enhance the color and flavor of many different sorts of foods.

Not-so-shocking truth

Many of us enjoy adding paprika to recipes to give them a little more zing. The bright red powder’s heat, smokiness, and sweetness can vary.

It truly is the kitchen’s everyman, sitting with equal assurance in a curry and beef stroganoff.

But what is it, exactly?

Several herbs and spices are called by the plant from which they are derived; for example, cinnamon is created from the inner bark of tree species belonging to the genus Cinnamomum, while cumin powder is made from dried cumin seeds.

There aren’t many hints there because paprika seeds, roots, or trees don’t exist.

Paprika’s name actually derives from the pepper used to make it—specifically, sweet red peppers.

The word is derived from the Hungarian “paprika,” which is a “diminution of Serbo-Croatian papar “pepper,” from Latin piper or Modern Greek piperi,” according Etymonline.com.

A “New World plant, imported into Eastern Europe by the Turks; known in Hungary by 1569” is added as the method of production.

One person recently acknowledged that they had only lately realized what the spice actually was, having simply assumed that “paprika trees” existed.

It was “very startling” to learn that paprika is simply dried and crushed red bell peppers, they tweeted.

I’m not sure why I believed there was a paprika tree somewhere, for example.

The tweet has received more than 15,000 retweets and 170,000 likes since it was posted at the end of January, indicating that it was not only their discovery.

Some remarked, “Like I could’ve swore there was a paprika plant,” while some were perplexed that others weren’t aware because it was “common knowledge.”

Another person sent a picture of a paprika packet with red peppers printed on the front, which they had never previously connected.

They said, “OMG, I just pulled this out that my mother sent to me in one of her weird packages.

Others shared similar food-related misconceptions, one of whom apologetically said: “You’re not as awful as me who didn’t realize guacamole is just avocados. That has always tasted familiar to me. SMH.”

Social media is flooded with snackers debating whether the name of the green Pringles tube has changed. But, a contentious discussion about whether the name of the green Pringles tubes, “Pringles Sour Cream & Onion,” has changed has erupted among crisp devotees on social media. The argument was triggered when a number of crisp crunchers raced to sites such as Reddit and TikTok to argue the green tube did previously have a different name.

Official Statements

The Pringles devotees acknowledged that they were perplexed because they couldn’t discover any internet proof of the name change. The green crisp tube is definitely labeled “Pringles Sour Cream & Onion,” and the company’s website states this in its description: “Pringles Sour Cream & Onion crisps are the perfect combination of green onion taste and savory sour cream flavors certain to satisfy even the most intense of cravings.

Setting the Record Straight

A social media user reportedly contacted Pringles to put an end to the argument, as they reacted to a Reddit post. The statement reads:  “Pringles used to market a flavor variety in the UK called Sour Cream and Chive and sometimes our consumers use the name of this flavor variety when making inquiries or referring to our currently available Pringles Sour Cream and Onion flavor.”

While the debate is still ongoing to know what the flavor really is, fans have kept going back and forth about it all over the internet. But what could really set things straight is if Pringles themselves would set the record straight and come up with a recent statement and address all those concerns. Needless to say, this may be something small when we’re talking about huge companies and lots of economies to tackle too, but perhaps in time, this issue would grab the attention of the higher ups of Pringles. And maybe then, we could all get an answer of what that tasty flavor really is.

*WARNING!!! This article may have content that could upset readers or cause discomfort*

After posting the video of herself dining into the enormous bowl of soup, teacher Phonchanok Srisunaklua, whose YouTube channel is called Gin Zap Bep Nua Nua and translates to “Eat spicy and delicious,” provoked controversy last week.

A Huge Deal

After recording herself consuming a bowl of soup made from a protected species of bat, the YouTuber was taken into custody. The outrage over Phonchanok’s film was not about the dark brown soup or the tomatoes floating in it; rather, it was about the Lesser Asiatic yellow bats in the bowl. There are innumerable channels on the internet devoted to food and eating.

Getting Ratings

Phonchanok recorded herself dissecting the bats and dipping them in a sauce, calling them “delicious,” as if having the bats in the soup wasn’t enough. To the shock of the viewers, who lambasted her for putting herself “at risk,” she showed the bat to the camera, pointed out its teeth, and crunched down on the “soft bones.”

Since then, the video has been removed from the original page, and Phonchanok was detained for breaking the Wildlife Conservation and Protection Act with the video. She might now spend the next five years in jail or pay a $14,000 fine.